Limit this search to....

A Union of Peoples
Contributor(s): Eleftheriadis, Pavlos (Author)
ISBN: 019885417X     ISBN-13: 9780198854173
Publisher: Oxford University Press, USA
OUR PRICE:   $118.75  
Product Type: Hardcover - Other Formats
Published: June 2020
Qty:
Temporarily out of stock - Will ship within 2 to 5 weeks
Additional Information
BISAC Categories:
- Law | Constitutional
- Law | Jurisprudence
Physical Information: 0.9" H x 6.2" W x 9.3" (1.40 lbs) 304 pages
 
Descriptions, Reviews, Etc.
Publisher Description:
Many political and legal philosophers compare the EU to a federal union and believe its basic laws should be subject to the standards of constitutional law, and thus find it lacking or incomplete. This book proposes a rival theory: that the substance of EU law is not constitutional, but
international, and provides a close examination of the treaties and the precedents of the European courts to explore this concept further.

Just like international law, EU law applies primarily to the relations between member states, who have democratically chosen to adapt their constitutional arrangements in order to share legislative and executive powers with their partners. The legal architecture of the European Union is thus best
understood under a theory of dualism and not pluralism.

According to this 'internationalist' view, EU law is part of the law of nations and its distinction from domestic law is a matter of substance, not form. This arrangement is supported by a cosmopolitan theory of international justice, which we may call progressive internationalism. The EU is a union
of democratic peoples, freely organizing their interdependence on the basis of principles of equality and reciprocity. Its central principles are not the principles of a constitution, but cosmopolitan principles of accountability, liberty, and fairness.

Presenting an 'internationalist' reading, this book proposes that the EU is a creation of the law of nations, and argues for a dualist account of its legal architecture, with EU law and domestic law allocated different institutional roles.