| Commodity & Propriety: Competing Visions of Property in American Legal Thought, 1776-1970 Contributor(s): Alexander, Gregory S. (Author) |
|
 |
ISBN: 0226013537 ISBN-13: 9780226013534 Publisher: University of Chicago Press OUR PRICE: $94.05 Product Type: Hardcover - Other Formats Published: February 1998 Annotation: Most people understand property as something that is owned, a means of creating individual wealth. But in "Commodity and Propriety," the first full-length history of the meaning of property, Gregory Alexander uncovers in American legal writing a competing vision of property that has existed alongside the traditional conception. Property, Alexander argues, has also been understood as "proprietary," a mechanism for creating and maintaining a properly ordered society. This view of property has even operated in periods--such as the second half of the nineteenth century--when market forces seemed to dominate social and legal relationships. In demonstrating how the understanding of property as a private basis for the public good has competed with the better-known market-oriented conception, Alexander radically rewrites the history of property, with significant implications for current political debates and recent Supreme Court decisions. |
| Additional Information |
| BISAC Categories: - Law | Property - History | United States - General - Business & Economics | Economics - Theory |
| Dewey: 330.17 |
| LCCN: 97016784 |
| Lexile Measure: 1580 |
| Physical Information: 1.45" H x 6.35" W x 9.33" (1.96 lbs) 496 pages |
| Descriptions, Reviews, Etc. |
| Publisher Description: Most people understand property as something that is owned, a means of creating individual wealth. But in Commodity and Propriety, the first full-length history of the meaning of property, Gregory Alexander uncovers in American legal writing a competing vision of property that has existed alongside the traditional conception. Property, Alexander argues, has also been understood as proprietary, a mechanism for creating and maintaining a properly ordered society. This view of property has even operated in periods--such as the second half of the nineteenth century--when market forces seemed to dominate social and legal relationships. In demonstrating how the understanding of property as a private basis for the public good has competed with the better-known market-oriented conception, Alexander radically rewrites the history of property, with significant implications for current political debates and recent Supreme Court decisions. |