Limit this search to....

Us Independent Film After 1989: Possible Films
Contributor(s): Perkins, Claire (Editor), Verevis, Constantine (Editor)
ISBN: 0748692444     ISBN-13: 9780748692446
Publisher: Edinburgh University Press
OUR PRICE:   $114.00  
Product Type: Hardcover - Other Formats
Published: March 2015
Qty:
Temporarily out of stock - Will ship within 2 to 5 weeks
Additional Information
BISAC Categories:
- Literary Criticism | English, Irish, Scottish, Welsh
- Performing Arts | Film - History & Criticism
- Performing Arts | Film - Reference
Dewey: 828.912
LCCN: 2014504319
Physical Information: 0.8" H x 6.1" W x 9.3" (1.19 lbs) 240 pages
 
Descriptions, Reviews, Etc.
Publisher Description:

In contemporary film and popular culture the terms 'independent' and 'indie' hold instant recognition and considerable cultural cachet. As both a brand of American filmmaking and a keynote of critical film discourse, indie denotes specific textual, industrial and reception practices that have been enthusiastically cultivated across the last decade of the twentieth century and the first of the twenty-first. Underpinning this cultural category is a canon of highly visible films and filmmakers whose 'maverick' personas and self-aware stylisation have successfully sold indie as a quality, alternative worldview--figures like Quentin Tarantino, Joel and Ethan Coen, Kevin Smith and Wes Anderson, and films like Slacker, Memento, Happiness and Juno.

US Independent Filmmaking After 1989: Possible Films reframes this dominant indie canon by attending to a group of films that have not been so fully subsumed by its critical and promotional rhetoric. In 20 close analyses, a diverse range of leading film scholars and commentators allow the contours of the indie sensibility to emerge in and through their individual experiences of a single film that has not received the sustained critical acclaim of more popular titles. With particular representation from female directors--who are almost wholly excluded from the dominant indie canon--these idiosyncratic films are shown to demonstrate central tenets of indie scholarship and simultaneously emphasise the classifying processes that obscure them.