Limit this search to....

Antigone's Daughters?: Gender, Genealogy, and the Politics of Authorship in 20th-Century Portuguese Women's Writing
Contributor(s): Owen, Hilary (Author), Pazos Alonso, Cláudia (Author)
ISBN: 1611480027     ISBN-13: 9781611480023
Publisher: Bucknell University Press
OUR PRICE:   $102.60  
Product Type: Hardcover - Other Formats
Published: February 2011
Qty:
Temporarily out of stock - Will ship within 2 to 5 weeks
Additional Information
BISAC Categories:
- Literary Criticism | European - Spanish & Portuguese
- Literary Criticism | Women Authors
- Literary Criticism | Feminist
Dewey: 869
LCCN: 2010019597
Physical Information: 0.9" H x 6.1" W x 9" (1.10 lbs) 250 pages
Themes:
- Sex & Gender - Feminine
- Cultural Region - Portuguese
 
Descriptions, Reviews, Etc.
Publisher Description:
Antigone's Daughters? provides the first detailed discussion in English of six well-known Portuguese women writers, working across a wide range of genres: Florbela Espanca (1894-1930), Irene Lisboa (1892-1958), Agustina Bessa Lu s, (1923- ), Nat lia Correia (1923-93), H lia Correia (1949 -) and L dia Jorge (1946 - ). Together they cover the span of the 20th century and afford historical insights into the complex gender politics of achieving institutional acceptance and validation in the Portuguese national canon at different points in the 20th century. Although a patrilinear evolutionary model visibly structures national literary history in Portugal to the present day, women writers and critics have not generally sought to replace this with a matrilinear feminist counter-history. The unifying metaphor that the authors adopt here for the purpose of discussing Portuguese women's ambivalent response to female genealogy is the classical figure of Antigone, who paradoxically sacrifices her own genealogical continuity in the name of defending family and kinship, while resisting the patriarchal pragmatics of state-building. Should women writers, faced with the absence of a female tradition, posit a woman-centred place outside the jurisdiction of male genealogy, however strategically essentialist that place may be, or should they primarily eschew fixed sexual identity to act as unnameable saboteurs, undoing the law of patriarchal tradition from within?