| International Adjudication on Trial: The Effectiveness of the Wto Dispute Settlement System Contributor(s): Agon, Sivan Shlomo (Author) |
|
 |
ISBN: 0198788967 ISBN-13: 9780198788966 Publisher: Oxford University Press, USA OUR PRICE: $128.25 Product Type: Hardcover Published: November 2019 |
| Additional Information |
| BISAC Categories: - Law | Commercial - International Trade - Law | International |
| Dewey: 341.522 |
| Physical Information: 1.2" H x 6.2" W x 9.3" (1.60 lbs) 368 pages |
| Descriptions, Reviews, Etc. |
| Publisher Description: Is the World Trade Organization (WTO) dispute settlement system (DSS) effective? How exactly is the effectiveness of this adjudicative system to be defined and measured? Is its effectiveness all about compliance? If not, what goals, beyond compliance, is the WTO DSS expected to achieve? Has it fulfilled these objectives so far, and how can their achievement and the system's effectiveness be enhanced in the future? Building on a theoretical model derived from the social sciences, this book lays down the analytical framework required to answer these questions, while crafting a revealing insider's account of the WTO DSS-one of the most important and debated sites of the evolving international judiciary. Drawing on interviews with WTO adjudicators, WTO Secretariat staff, ambassadors, trade delegates, and trade lawyers, the book offers an elaborate analysis of the various goals steering the DSS's work, the diverse roles it plays, the challenges it confronts, and the outcomes it produces. Through this insider look at the WTO DSS and detailed examination of landmark trade disputes, the book uncovers the oft-hidden dynamics of WTO adjudication and provides fresh perspective on the DSS's operation and the undercurrents affecting its effectiveness. Given the pivotal role the WTO DSS has assumed in the multilateral trading regime since its inception in 1995 and the systemic pressures it has recently come to face, this book makes an important contribution towards understanding and measuring the benefits (as well as the costs) this adjudicative body generates, while providing valuable insights into current debates on its reform. |